Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So "The Hateful 8" incident..
#1
Man that's an oops.

I hear insurance paid out for the purchase price.  I guess there's a possibility the movie proceeds will cover the rest.  -Maybe-

CF Martin got a lot of free press out of it - that's worth something.  I know its a niche industry, but still its free press.
Listless Vessels!
Reply
#2
That is just awful .
Do as thou wilt . Aleister Crowley
Reply
#3
Agreed - Accident or not.

Hell, the movie got some free press.  

Seems the remains would be of value to someone willing to pay a high price...  :wwe:

[Image: 2016-02-04T144024Z_01_WAS707_RTRIDSP_3_U...jpg&w=1484]
Listless Vessels!
Reply
#4
What:?:
Because I said so. 
Reply
#5
I believe that the guitar that was destroyed in the movie was an actual 1800s Martin.

Sent from my 831C using Tapatalk
(05-06-2015, 11:27 AM)youngthrasher9 Wrote: If it came down to it, I might suck dick for my family.


Reply
#6
(02-05-2016, 07:52 PM)Agileguy Wrote: I believe that the guitar that was destroyed in the movie was an actual 1800s Martin.

Sent from my 831C using Tapatalk

It was and I shed no tears for Martin.  They had repos on set and the original got smashed accidentally. Why the fuck would they allow a 1870 Martin in the snowy mountains of Colorado in the first place? Once the Repos were made the 1870 should have gone back to the Martin Museum. 
Reply
#7
Hindsight is 20/20.

We'll never know the whole story, like terms of the loan.  I assume it would be stipulated reasonable care (like humidification) would be agreed upon.
Listless Vessels!
Reply
#8
The only redeeming part of this story is Snake Plissken is the one that destroyed the guitar.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)